Read the full story
Source: The Hindu BusinessLine

CBI books Essel Group chairman Subhash Chandra in LIC Housing Finance ₹1,322-cr fraud case
The CBI has filed a major case against Subhash Chandra regarding a massive loan default at LIC Housing Finance. This investigation follows allegations of cheating and submitting false wealth documents for loans.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has officially booked Subhash Chandra, the founder of Essel Group and Zee Entertainment, in a major fraud case. The case involves a massive amount of ₹1,322 crore. This action started after LIC Housing Finance Ltd (LICHFL) filed a formal complaint on August 31. The agency is looking into charges of cheating, criminal conspiracy, and criminal breach of trust (misusing someone's property or money).
The trouble started with two major loan facilities. In March 2018, LICHFL gave ₹500 crore to Vasant Sagar Properties and Pan India Infra Projects. This was done after Subhash Chandra gave a "letter of continuing guarantee" (a promise to pay if the company fails). At that time, he submitted a certificate saying his net worth was over ₹59,000 crore. Later in August 2018, another loan of ₹480 crore was given to Digital Subscriber Management and Spirit Infrapower. This was a rental discounting facility (a loan against future rent payments). For this, he claimed a net worth of over ₹40,000 crore.
However, these companies stopped paying their dues, leading to a default. When the case went to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) proceedings, things took a shocking turn. The CBI FIR states that Chandra reportedly denied having the massive net worth he had earlier claimed in the certificates. The complaint alleges that he created false documents to show an inflated wealth just to get the funds disbursed from LICHFL.
The scale of the default is huge. During the personal insolvency process at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandra offered to pay back only ₹6.25 crore. This is a tiny fraction compared to the total claims from creditors, which exceed ₹22,000 crore. Naturally, lenders like LICHFL are fighting this repayment plan. Chandra’s office has defended the situation, saying these huge claims are mostly due to corporate guarantees, not direct personal loans taken by him.
For bank officers in India, this case is a big lesson in Credit Appraisal (checking if a borrower can pay back). It shows the risks of relying too much on Personal Guarantees and net worth certificates without deep verification. If high-profile borrowers can deny their own certified wealth later, it makes the recovery process very hard for lenders. Bankers must be extra careful when verifying documents from third-party auditors and chartered accountants.
What happens next? The CBI will investigate the role of the directors and officers of the borrowing companies. They will also look into how the certificates showing the inflated net worth were created. For LICHFL, the priority will be to prove the "criminal intent" to recover as much money as possible. All eyes are now on the NCLT and the CBI to see if the recovery of ₹1,322 crore can actually happen.
