Important StoriesSupreme Court rules YES Bank's AT1 bond write-off illegalSTT collection surges 52% in FY27 so far amid market volatility; net direct tax collection grows 13%I am confident that we will have a India-US trade deal: Sergio GorAuto industry posts stellar performance in H1 FY27 led by GST 2.0, resilient rural-urban demandIndia's exports up 23% to $44.4 billion in Sep; trade deficit narrows to $30.21 billionFollow UsFOLLOW US ON WHATSAPPHomeGO BACK TO HOME THIS AD SUPPORTS OUR JOURNALISM. SUBSCRIBE FOR MINIMAL ADS. THIS AD SUPPORTS OUR JOURNALISM. SUBSCRIBE FOR MINIMAL ADS. Supreme Court rules YES Bank's AT1 bond write-off illegal Shares of Yes ⁠Bank fell 13% on Thursday after the news. By Reuters Updated - October 15, 2026 at 03:15 PM. | BENGALURU, Oct ​15 ×ShareWhatsAppXFacebookLinkedInMessengerRedditMailhttps://www.thehindubusinessline.com/money-and-banking/supreme-court-rules-yes-banks-at1-bond-write-off-illegal/article71587365.eceCopy FILE PHOTO: A YES Bank branch in New Delhi | Photo Credit: AINNIE ARIF

The Supreme Court of India has ruled the ​write-off of 84 billion Indian rupees ($884.37 million) of Yes ‌Bank additional tier-1 bonds as illegal, a Supreme Court lawyer ​related to the matter said on Thursday.

AT-1 bonds ⁠are debt securities that give a higher return to investors but also typically carry a risk of being written off or ‌converted to equity in times of a crisis.

The debt instrument was also in focus after Credit ‌Suisse’s controversial 2023 bond wipe out triggered lawsuits across multiple jurisdictions.

These ‌AT-1 ⁠bonds were written off after Yes Bank ⁠was declared insolvent in 2020, while the equity holders were only subject to a three-year lock-in on 75% of their total shares in the ​restructuring plan.

“The Supreme Court ‌has held the write-off of AT-1 bonds by the Administrator of Yes Bank to be illegal and arbitrary on the ground of it being against the Final Reconstruction ‌Scheme gazetted by the Union of India,” said ​Srijan Sinha, a partner at Edictum Law & Co., the lawyer representing Yes Bank’s AT-1 bondholders.

Shares of Yes ⁠Bank fell 13% on Thursday after the news.

Yes Bank did not immediately respond to Reuters’ email seeking a comment.

The ‌ruling comes as a relief to Yes Bank’s AT-1 bondholders, who have argued in courts that the bonds were mis-sold to them and could not be written off post the finalisation of the restructuring plan.

“Supreme Court decision seems to be on a technicality rather than the ‌underlying terms of the product,” said Vivek Ramji Iyer, a partner and ​national leader for the financial services risk advisory practice at Grant Thornton.

“This decision creates regulatory ⁠uncertainty that can have a potential to impact investor sentiment.”

In May ⁠last year, Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) agreed to acquire a 20% stake in Yes Bank, and ‌increased it by an additional 4.99% in August 2025.

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.

Terms & conditions | Institutional Subscriber