Responsibility of Paying Bank
Paying banker: Sec 31 (duty to pay if sufficient funds), Sec 85 (forged endorsement protection — order/bearer/draft), Sec 89 (material alteration not apparent), Sec 128 (crossed cheque). Forged drawer signature = NO protection (Canara Bank vs Canara Sales). Joint A/c: one forged signature = bank liable.
Banky Pays Cheques Safely! 💳
When your bank PAYS a cheque, you carry enormous responsibility. Pay a forged cheque = bank’s loss. Wrongfully dishonour = compensate the drawer. Understanding Sec 31, 85, 89, and 128 protects you and the bank from liability!
Why Read This Chapter?
Paying the wrong cheque or wrongfully refusing = legal liability for the bank
Exam Marks
3-4 questions — law for cheque payment = NI Act (not ICA/RBI Act/BR Act), customer must inform DRAWEE bank of lost cheques, joint A/c one forged signature = bank liable, payment in due course can be to agent/servant. Very high weightage!
Career Growth
Every cheque you authorise for payment carries legal risk — understanding paying bank duties = risk mitigation
Real Life
If your cheque is wrongfully dishonoured, you know the bank must compensate YOU (the drawer)
How Will It Benefit You?
Real career advantages
What Is This Chapter About?
30-second summary
Key Definitions — Banky Asks, Mentor Explains
Every term explained like you’re 10
Banky’s Understanding: Sec 31 NI Act: Drawee having sufficient funds properly applicable MUST pay cheque when duly required. Points: (1) Applies only to bankers. (2) Funds must be sufficient AND properly applicable. (3) Cheque must be properly drawn + signed. (4) Wrongful dishonour → compensate DRAWER only (not endorsee/holder). (5) Exception: if bank wound up → holder becomes creditor. (6) If paid disregarding crossing → liable to true owner.
Banky’s Understanding: Sec 85(1) — Order cheque: Bank discharged if endorsement APPEARS regular + payment in due course (Sec 10). Cannot be expected to know signatures of non-customers. Sec 85(2) — Bearer cheque: Bank discharged by payment to bearer in due course, regardless of forged/restrictive endorsement. Bearer cheque negotiated by delivery — endorsement irrelevant. Sec 85A — Draft: Same protection as Sec 85(1) for forged endorsement on draft.
Banky’s Understanding: Sec 89: If NI is materially altered but alteration NOT apparent at time of payment → bank paying according to apparent tenor in due course is discharged from liability. Also covers obliterated crossing. Under CTS: NO alterations/corrections allowed (use fresh cheque). Only date validation changes permitted. ⚠️ Sec 89 does NOT protect against forged drawer signature — because that is not an ‘alteration’ but a complete forgery making the cheque a nullity.
Banky’s Understanding: Forged drawer signature = NO PROTECTION for bank. Cheque is a nullity — no mandate to pay. Canara Bank vs Canara Sales Corp (SC 1987): Company’s accountant forged MD’s signature on 42 cheques (₹3.26 lakh). SC held: bank NOT entitled to debit customer’s account. No mandate = no authority. Joint A/c: If one signature forged → no mandate → bank liable (Bihta Cooperative vs Bank of Bihar, SC 1967). Bank can succeed only if it establishes adoption or estoppel.
Banky’s Understanding: Sec 128: Bank paying crossed cheque in due course → placed in same position as if paid to true owner. Conditions: General crossing → pay only to a banker. Special crossing → pay only to specified banker. Payment in due course (Sec 10). Sec 129: If bank pays crossed cheque to non-banker or wrong banker → loses protection → liable to true owner. Sec 127: Cheque crossed specially to >1 banker → should NOT be paid (except agent for collection).
Banky’s Understanding: Before paying, verify: (1) Date — not stale/post-dated. (2) Payee name — matches. (3) Amount — words = figures. (4) Crossing — general/special/A/c payee. (5) Endorsement — regular chain. (6) Signature — matches specimen. (7) Balance — sufficient + properly applicable. (8) Stop payment — check for countermand. (9) Garnishee/attachment orders. (10) Death/insolvency/insanity notice. (11) No material alteration (under CTS: no alterations at all). (12) Mutilation — if by drawer, get confirmation.
Chapter Explained in Simple Stories
So easy even Banky’s nephew understands
💳 Block 1: Duty to Pay & Protection Sections
Sec 31: MUST pay if sufficient funds properly applicable. Wrongful dishonour → compensate DRAWER only.
Sec 85(1): Order cheque — regular endorsement + due course = protected.
Sec 85(2): Bearer cheque — payment to bearer in due course = protected (forged endorsement irrelevant).
Sec 85A: Draft — same as Sec 85(1). Sec 89: Alteration not apparent + due course = protected.
Sec 128: Crossed cheque paid in due course = as if paid to true owner.
🚫 Block 2: Forged Signature = NO Protection
Forged drawer signature = NO protection! Cheque is a NULLITY — no mandate to pay.
Canara Bank vs Canara Sales (SC 1987): Accountant forged MD’s signature on 42 cheques → SC: bank cannot debit customer’s account.
Joint A/c: One forged signature → bank LIABLE (Bihta Cooperative vs Bank of Bihar).
Customer duty: Inform DRAWEE bank of lost cheques (exam PYQ!).
CTS: No alterations/corrections allowed — use fresh cheque.
Exam Angle — Every Testable Point
All facts, numbers, definitions JAIIB tests
✅ Must-Know Facts — Highest Probability
- Law for cheque payment = NI Act (not ICA/RBI Act/BR Act!) — exam PYQ!
- Customer must inform DRAWEE bank about lost cheques — exam PYQ!
- Joint A/c: one forged signature = bank liable (no mandate) — exam PYQ!
- Payment in due course: can be made to holder’s agent or servant — exam PYQ!
- Sec 31: must pay if sufficient funds — compensate DRAWER only (not holder)
- Sec 85(1): order cheque with forged endorsement — bank protected if due course
- Sec 85(2): bearer cheque — bank protected regardless of forged endorsement
- Sec 85A: draft with forged endorsement — bank protected if due course
- Sec 89: material alteration not apparent — bank protected if due course
- Sec 89 does NOT protect if drawer’s signature is forged
- Sec 128: crossed cheque paid in due course = as if paid to true owner
- Sec 129: paying crossed cheque to non-banker = bank LOSES protection
- Canara Bank vs Canara Sales Corp (SC 1987): forged signature = nullity
- Under CTS: NO alterations/corrections on cheques — use fresh cheque
- Stop payment by any joint holder | Partnership: all partners must cancel stop payment
- Verify: date, payee, amount, crossing, endorsement, signature, balance, stop, garnishee
📝 Previous Year Questions
Memory Tricks That STICK
Lock every fact permanently
🧠 Trick 1 — Cheque Law = NI Act
🧠 Trick 2 — Lost Cheque → Drawee Bank
🧠 Trick 3 — Forged Signature = Nullity
🧠 Trick 4 — Joint A/c One Forged
🧠 Trick 5 — Protection Map
Visual Summary — Chapter Map
Entire chapter in one diagram
Flash Revision — Last-Minute Cards
Read these 10 minutes before exam
⚡ Chapter 13 Complete — Responsibility of Paying Bank
- Sec 31: must pay if sufficient funds | Compensate DRAWER only | Law = NI Act
- Protections: Sec 85 (endorsement), Sec 89 (alteration), Sec 128 (crossing) — all need due course
- Forged drawer signature = NULLITY — NO protection | Canara Bank vs Canara Sales (SC 1987)
- Joint A/c: one forged = bank liable | Lost cheque → inform DRAWEE bank | CTS: no alterations
Banky says: “Sec 31=must pay, Sec 85/89/128=protections, forged signature=NULLITY, lost cheque→drawee bank!” 🎉💳
You now understand the paying banker’s duty and protections. Every cheque you pay carries legal weight — verify carefully! 💪